PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.21%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 875.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.13%
D&A growth well above SONY's 4.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
35.86%
Well above SONY's 21.41% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
4.02%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -3.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-1600.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 419.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-124.16%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -1339.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-19.80%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 228.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
98.52%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -96.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-143.48%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -215.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.25%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 112.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-63.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -7.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-897.06%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-67.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -16.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-8.01%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 8.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
207.14%
Growth well above SONY's 130.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-289.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -16.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.59%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
72.18%
Buyback growth of 72.18% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.