PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.72%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONY at -383.56%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-3.73%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONY at -10.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-114.47%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
4.39%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -42.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-75.85%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 27.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
672.84%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -69.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
34.30%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -88.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-260.29%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 118.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-94.92%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 28.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.42%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONY at -42.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.17%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 13.99%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-300.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-6.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -4.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
3.15%
Below 50% of SONY's 8.36%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-64.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -142.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-5.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -26.84%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-125.16%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONY is 94.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
186.25%
Issuance growth of 186.25% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-38.57%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.