PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.31%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 193.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
24.41%
D&A growth well above SONY's 5.69%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
395.91%
Well above SONY's 375.34% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-7.66%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 46.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-123.51%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 240.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-90.78%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -234.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
413.27%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 269.38%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
115.00%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -214.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-2.08%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 140.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.45%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 637.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
15.63%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -12.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-25.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
5.48%
Purchases well above SONY's 7.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
28.52%
At 75-90% of SONY's 37.21%. Bill Ackman would push for additional sales if those assets are non-strategic or have peaked in value.
100.00%
Growth well above SONY's 122.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
48.94%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 48.83%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-27.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -0.31%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-93.45%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-43.47%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.