PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -174.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.13%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 25.95%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-252.82%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
6.89%
Less SBC growth vs. SONY's 305.68%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
57.02%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 149.87%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-1311.03%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 263.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-186.72%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -55.82%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
300.14%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -19.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-95.74%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 1153.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.09%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 33.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-75.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -40.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
1.74%
Acquisition growth of 1.74% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
35.83%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -29.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-12.09%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -59.29%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-447.83%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 89.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
87.94%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -240.84%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
41.86%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -20.42%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
1360.00%
Issuance growth of 1360.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-32.53%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.