PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
65.06%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 219.20%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-5.29%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONY at -18.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
210.71%
Well above SONY's 163.59% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
17.81%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
1474.69%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -206.91%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
160.13%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -123.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
66.78%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -211.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-109.83%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 186.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-1550.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -196.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.81%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -141.51%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-9.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -9.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23.89%
Acquisition growth of 23.89% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-66.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -11.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
1.09%
Below 50% of SONY's 196.08%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-7.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -498.17%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1387.27%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 37.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -486.62%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-99.54%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
48.22%
Buyback growth of 48.22% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.