PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.87%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 184.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.98%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 13.59%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
39.93%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -57.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
0.57%
SBC growth of 0.57% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
28.66%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 109.64%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-86.76%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -825.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
164.71%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 206.07%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
97.90%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -235.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-651.21%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 66.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-43.94%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -130.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.34%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 64.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-11.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -8.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
88.89%
Acquisition growth of 88.89% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
29.50%
Purchases well above SONY's 37.17%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-6.49%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -39.73%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-420.83%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 262.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
67.28%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 25.38%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-52.48%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.