PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
98.48%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SONY's 148.65%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
17.23%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -29.93%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
673.91%
Well above SONY's 97.84% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
21.94%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
3.56%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -305.41%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
142.00%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -126.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-92.69%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -321.12%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-78.45%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 156.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
110.34%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -223.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.88%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -96.21%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
15.30%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 12.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
88.74%
Acquisition growth of 88.74% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-78.69%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 25.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.55%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SONY's 28.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-149.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 115.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-158.51%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 39.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x SONY's 63.43%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-80.07%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.