229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-38.35%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONY at -53.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-21.93%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONY at -3.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-5.65%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-3.11%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-187.79%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 61.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
46.49%
AR growth well above SONY's 8.43%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
65.86%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -141.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-478.94%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 80.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-726.19%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 75.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
123.72%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -76.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-53.84%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 303.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
11.84%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 6.32%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-194.12%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.07%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -93.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-11.63%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -37.19%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
190.38%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -250.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
25.73%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -104.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.01%
Buyback growth of 34.01% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.