PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.96%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 71.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.94%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -1.95%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
41.75%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SONY's 238.92%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-1.97%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-62.68%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 236.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-132.26%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -195.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-19.19%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 231.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
117.70%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -191.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
25.10%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONY's 168.85%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
3.08%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -495.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-31.01%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 254.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
21.72%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SONY's 44.45%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-262.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
46.93%
Purchases well above SONY's 15.20%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-31.75%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 40.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
21.28%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 139.56%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
77.61%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 30.01%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.63%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
0.95%
Buyback growth of 0.95% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.