PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.91%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 52.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.52%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 19.33%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-38.11%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 14.95%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.59%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
101.89%
Well above SONY's 52.93% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-582.54%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 253.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-624.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -87.47%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
798.79%
AP growth well above SONY's 29.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-5.58%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 492.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-135.82%
Negative yoy while SONY is 104.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
80.54%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SONY's 114.01%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-69.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -32.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
55.25%
Acquisition growth of 55.25% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-48.98%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 12.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
29.60%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -1.05%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-181.58%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 642.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-212.64%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 13.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
35.47%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -86.02%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
28000.00%
Issuance growth of 28000.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-9.90%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.