PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.11%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 51.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.22%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 3.04%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
98.52%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -117.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.01%
SBC growth of 4.01% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-105.64%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 49.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
263.25%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -88.73%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-846.77%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -126.78%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-295.25%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 30.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-130.76%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 68.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1172.73%
Negative yoy while SONY is 74.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-46.52%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 321.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-49.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -29.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23.70%
Some acquisitions while SONY is negative at -0.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
82.62%
Purchases well above SONY's 18.94%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
29.59%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -37.64%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
702.33%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -116.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
311.26%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -12.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -190.58%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.42%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.