PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.62%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -101.53%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.34%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 8.00%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-53.91%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 325.29%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.44%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
142.53%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 2521.14%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-3996.14%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 240.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
14.71%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -79.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
1174.40%
AP growth well above SONY's 18.41%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
112.63%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONY's 943.62%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
86.87%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONY's 334.35%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
34.75%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SONY's 50.92%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
6.92%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -22.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-130.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-64.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -33.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-8.80%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -41.39%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
69.96%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 533.29%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-176.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -64.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34000.00%
Issuance growth of 34000.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
8.08%
Buyback growth of 8.08% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.