PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
41.35%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 5016.23%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
23.28%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -28.88%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-89.79%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
15.91%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
117.69%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -142.48%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
156.51%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -111.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-155.41%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -119.24%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-141.85%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 161.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-727.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -156.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-58.82%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -204.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
36.71%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -83.73%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-10.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
42.41%
Acquisition growth of 42.41% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
50.97%
Purchases well above SONY's 6.02%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
6.73%
1.25-1.5x SONY's 4.88%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
74.77%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -100.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
294.74%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 22.69%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -631.29%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
53.96%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of SONY's 79.29%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.