PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-13.12%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 135.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.52%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 26.85%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
148.59%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -3126.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-1.19%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
39.46%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -224.25%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-68.99%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 25.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
2045.71%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 213.02%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
101.91%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -192.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-38.82%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -501.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
22.36%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONY's 189.15%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
4.31%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONY's 56.19%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
15.36%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 7.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-158.06%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-19.74%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 18.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
69.60%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -3.20%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-446.51%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 68.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
106.04%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -53.34%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-20.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -174.77%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-99.74%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
28.47%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 21.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.