PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.26%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -77.04%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
8.39%
D&A growth well above SONY's 3.49%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-451.16%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 119.69%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.20%
SBC growth of 0.20% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
177.20%
Well above SONY's 241.53% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-1054.08%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 379.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-152.26%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -81.51%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
8027.73%
AP growth well above SONY's 41.05%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
163.98%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONY's 465.95%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-149.60%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -238.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
71.11%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -27.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-38.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -9.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
95.94%
Acquisition spending well above SONY's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-120.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -8.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-45.45%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 23.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-171.81%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 93.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-102.90%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 46.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-10.17%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONY is 96.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
38900.00%
Issuance growth of 38900.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-2.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -227254.55%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.