PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.04%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 20.07%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.22%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONY at -7.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
375.83%
Well above SONY's 350.04% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
0.06%
SBC growth of 0.06% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
78.52%
Well above SONY's 130.95% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-140.52%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -59.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-194.77%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 294.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
121.99%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -293.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
78.99%
Growth well above SONY's 36.40%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
241.03%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -896.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
22.24%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.98%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
15.54%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -33.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-92.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -93.72%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-3.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 23.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-32.99%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -7.42%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
26.30%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -338.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-157.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -28.18%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
75.39%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of SONY's 94.87%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
14.44%
Buyback growth below 50% of SONY's 68.80%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.