PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
126.90%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 1469.21%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.33%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 8.66%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
85.39%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SONY's 238.94%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
17.17%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
38.12%
Well above SONY's 42.43% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-719.06%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -99.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-593.43%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -582.90%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
222.23%
AP growth well above SONY's 113.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
210.42%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -98.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
933.33%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -168.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
88.39%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -75.53%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-96.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -6.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
82.35%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. SONY's 323.30%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-117.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -30.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
33.80%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -17.83%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
291.18%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -56.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-255.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -45.70%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
81.67%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -209.92%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-44.15%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 99.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.