PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.82%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 87.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.91%
D&A growth well above SONY's 7.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-156.90%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.93%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-170.57%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 1148.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
178.56%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -672065.38%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
70.95%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -262.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-209.22%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 2564.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-77.55%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -3356.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-2096.00%
Negative yoy while SONY is 81.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-38.13%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 302.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
35.17%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -7.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while SONY is negative at -77.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
13.01%
Purchases well above SONY's 23.57%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-22.57%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -18.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -118.84%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-20.78%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 14.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-250.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -33.16%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.93%
We have some buyback growth while SONY is negative at -165.52%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.