PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.98%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONY at -19.37%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.25%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 12.75%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-255.70%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 116.97%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.06%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-24.29%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -47.11%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-88.01%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -62.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
104.71%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 184.58%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
100.89%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -104.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-68.11%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 155.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
56.91%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -318.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-12.04%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONY at -10.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
7.76%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SONY's 18.44%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.31%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -32.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-5.07%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 17.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.45%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -20.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
14.29%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -0.23%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-21.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -36.36%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.