PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.26%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 63.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.48%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 14.67%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
310.84%
Deferred tax of 310.84% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.40%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-57.16%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 30.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-110.35%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -433.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-104.17%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 183.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
79.79%
AP growth well above SONY's 37.69%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-322.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -4.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
78.07%
Well above SONY's 8.70%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-18.72%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 315.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.39%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 20.88%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.75%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -383.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-26.78%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -75.64%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-70.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -40.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
145.70%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 70.48%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-71.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONY is 78.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.38%
We have some buyback growth while SONY is negative at -107.93%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.