PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.71%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 15.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.31%
D&A growth well above SONY's 2.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.57%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
224.24%
Well above SONY's 60.03% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-137.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -34.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
97.03%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 65.29%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
127.05%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -154.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.72%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -145.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.63%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 545.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
28.22%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -68.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 29.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.38%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -26.14%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-377.36%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 175.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-81.16%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 32.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-233.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONY is 16.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.80%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.12%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.