PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.47%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -63.72%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-13.07%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 8.43%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
SBC growth of 0.31% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-909.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 23.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-367.89%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 250.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
4427.27%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 111.91%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
274.96%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -140.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-811.11%
Negative yoy while SONY is 383.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.13%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 31.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-3.34%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 13.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.32%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. SONY's 65.29%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
7.06%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -47.43%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-15.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -125.76%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
447.83%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 10.42%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
73.43%
Debt repayment above 1.5x SONY's 29.97%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 79.76%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.