PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.79%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 94.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-13.60%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 4.53%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
39.48%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 91.26%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
43.04%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -227.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
199.07%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -10.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-18.92%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 75.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
19.60%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONY's 106.80%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
89.65%
Well above SONY's 56.45%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-19.99%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 688.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-4.46%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 8.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -60.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-36.59%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -92.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
94.69%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 387.64%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-70.21%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
49.95%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -848.12%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -194.32%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.