PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-9.25%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 11.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
12.90%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 22.92%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-15.64%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.57%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -19.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.95%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 80.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
500.00%
Well above VUZI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-0.49%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -38.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-18.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -18.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-479.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
52.30%
Liquidation growth of 52.30% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-107.92%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 6.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-244.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -13.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.50%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 124.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-51.31%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.