PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-57.50%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 11.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-11.63%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 22.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
24.36%
Deferred tax of 24.36% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -19.64%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-170.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -73.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-69.05%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 80.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
833.33%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -192.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
25.81%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. VUZI's 352.14%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-47.93%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-104.59%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -38.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-220.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -18.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.75%
Purchases growth of 86.75% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-30.88%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
126.47%
Growth well above VUZI's 6.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
700.00%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -13.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
760.00%
Stock issuance far above VUZI's 124.06%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.