PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.95%
Net income growth under 50% of VUZI's 11.25%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-28.13%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 22.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-200.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.03%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -19.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
62.96%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -73.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-60.16%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 80.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
192.00%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -192.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 352.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
100.00%
Well above VUZI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
56.80%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -38.64%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
37.04%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -18.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.06%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
55.50%
Liquidation growth of 55.50% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
19.57%
Growth well above VUZI's 6.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
72.66%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -13.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1250.00%
Stock issuance far above VUZI's 124.06%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.