PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.37%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-20.83%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 22.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
325.00%
Deferred tax of 325.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -19.64%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-184.40%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -73.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
57.14%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 80.56%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-99.26%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-66.67%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 352.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-87.04%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-67.29%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -38.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
63.16%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -18.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
77.97%
Acquisition growth of 77.97% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
29.85%
Purchases growth of 29.85% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
16.11%
Liquidation growth of 16.11% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
55.56%
Growth well above VUZI's 6.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
295.15%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -13.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.85%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 124.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.