PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
53.66%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
65.00%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 22.92%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
20.00%
Deferred tax of 20.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2180.00%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -19.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
190.91%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -73.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-83.33%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 80.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-125.18%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
20.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. VUZI's 352.14%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-300.00%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
200.00%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -38.64%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
24.14%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -18.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.78%
Purchases growth of 40.78% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-7.71%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.78%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -13.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.45%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. VUZI's 124.06%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.