PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.62%
Net income growth at 75-90% of VUZI's 11.25%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
12.20%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 22.92%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-161.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
70.00%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -72.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
172.97%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -19.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
365.22%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -73.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-262.50%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 80.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-775.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
234.48%
Growth well above VUZI's 352.14%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-95.62%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-11.94%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -38.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-46.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -18.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.30%
Purchases growth of 20.30% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
29.90%
Liquidation growth of 29.90% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
68.75%
Growth well above VUZI's 6.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
133.55%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -13.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.55%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 124.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.