PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
31.40%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.96%
Less D&A growth vs. VUZI's 22.92%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-63.16%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
300.00%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -72.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-768.66%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -19.64%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-541.18%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -73.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-382.14%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 80.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
348.59%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -192.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-8466.67%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 352.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-62.37%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -38.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
14.58%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -18.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.19%
Purchases growth of 17.19% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-3.11%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-550.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 6.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
121.68%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -13.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.08%
Stock issuance far above VUZI's 124.06%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.