PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-23.31%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 11.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-6.76%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 22.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-32.88%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
36.96%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -72.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-135.68%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -19.64%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
287.80%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -73.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
387.88%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 80.56%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-399.39%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
18.50%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. VUZI's 352.14%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-80.00%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-59.51%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -38.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
19.84%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -18.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.30%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
81.06%
Liquidation growth of 81.06% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-113.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 6.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
20.75%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -13.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.74%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 124.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.