PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.97%
Net income growth under 50% of VUZI's 41.04%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
14.53%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -62.16%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-1268.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.02%
SBC growth of 6.02% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
8114.63%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -109.52%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-8090.00%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
119.89%
Inventory growth of 119.89% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
474.90%
AP growth of 474.90% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
559.71%
Growth of 559.71% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
40.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. VUZI's 147.53%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
225.13%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VUZI's 124.56%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-27.88%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 77.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
32.84%
Liquidation growth of 32.84% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-2900.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-45.26%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 77.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.55%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.