PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-28.16%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -130.88%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.74%
Less D&A growth vs. VUZI's 21.43%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
6.52%
Deferred tax of 6.52% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
6.47%
SBC growth of 6.47% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-235.22%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 81.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
16.81%
AR growth of 16.81% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-25.66%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
0.91%
AP growth of 0.91% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-312.56%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 81.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-85.71%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 29.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-78.64%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 136.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
67.14%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -50.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.60%
Purchases growth of 20.60% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
39.82%
Liquidation growth of 39.82% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
108.33%
Growth of 108.33% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
57.34%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -50.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.56%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.