PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.84%
Net income growth at 50-75% of VUZI's 17.57%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
0.55%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -40.44%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-31.29%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.10%
Negative yoy SBC while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
90.88%
Less working capital growth vs. VUZI's 218.66%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-385.61%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-180.95%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
215.66%
AP growth of 215.66% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
89.55%
Growth well above VUZI's 49.84%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
900.00%
Some yoy increase while VUZI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
169.92%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -227.43%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-134.48%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -13.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.71%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
48.47%
Liquidation growth of 48.47% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-240.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
63.66%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -13.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
268.89%
Issuance growth of 268.89% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.