229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.92%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -5.84%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.24%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 13.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-257.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.56%
Less SBC growth vs. VUZI's 288.85%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
1151.91%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -346.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
10.48%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -172.15%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-10.29%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with VUZI at -286.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-15.81%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -171.79%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
4717.39%
Growth well above VUZI's 969.86%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-20.00%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
37.00%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -300.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-73.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -117.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-13.57%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-71.43%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-181.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -117.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.65%
Issuance growth of 12.65% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.