229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
102.88%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -66.38%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.09%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -4.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
233.65%
Some yoy growth while VUZI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
13.89%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -70.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
13.50%
Well above VUZI's 22.34% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
140.15%
AR growth well above VUZI's 203.77%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-61.33%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 86.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
29.19%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -12.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-71.47%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -135.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 123.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
85.88%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -1.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
19.28%
Lower CapEx growth vs. VUZI's 71.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
7.22%
Liquidation growth of 7.22% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-483.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 86.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-4.96%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 71.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We slightly raise equity while VUZI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.