PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-9.00%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 8.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.35%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 3.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
10.12%
Deferred tax of 10.12% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
12.68%
SBC growth of 12.68% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-206.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 357.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-22.14%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -147.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
48.76%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VUZI's 183.70%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-201.88%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 64.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-104.79%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 591.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.70%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 95.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
21.00%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -4.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.06%
Purchases growth of 6.06% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
33.85%
Liquidation growth of 33.85% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
214.29%
Growth well above VUZI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
97.90%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -4.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.22%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.