PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
32.43%
Net income growth at 50-75% of VUZI's 59.89%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
20.51%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -16.06%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-64.94%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.28%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -6.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
2.92%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -225.18%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-267.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -255.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
64.14%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -7307.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
23.50%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -55.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
58.08%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -134.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.37%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -1116.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-29.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -95.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
92.07%
Acquisition growth of 92.07% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-1.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
9.53%
Liquidation growth of 9.53% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
152.17%
Growth of 152.17% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
19.28%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -95.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.05%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.