PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.37%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.72%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
8.21%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 10.61%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
479.58%
Well above VUZI's 12.24% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
33.48%
SBC growth well above VUZI's 19.87%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
241.94%
Well above VUZI's 12.41% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
74.94%
AR growth well above VUZI's 38.76%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
252.29%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 44.14%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-32.88%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -224.99%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
75.14%
Growth well above VUZI's 123.03%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy, with VUZI at -452.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
71.97%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -48.04%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-55.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -89.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-18.76%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-21.53%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-195.83%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 44.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-144.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -89.48%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.20%
Issuance growth of 16.20% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.