PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.28%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -120.68%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
21.91%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -0.04%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-10.09%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 2165.14%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-4.01%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -0.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-153.64%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 108.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
144.29%
AR growth well above VUZI's 238.74%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-127.11%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 181.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-130.69%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -20.72%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-89.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -462.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.37%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 119.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
48.06%
CapEx growth well above VUZI's 43.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.89%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
115.00%
Liquidation growth of 115.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
252.17%
Growth well above VUZI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
85.81%
Investing outflow well above VUZI's 43.79%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.50%
Issuance growth of 37.50% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.