PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.06%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 0.75%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
10.83%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 0.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-9.59%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.05%
Negative yoy SBC while VUZI is 22.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
292.51%
Less working capital growth vs. VUZI's 694.22%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-232.75%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -130.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
191.11%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -12.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
218.61%
AP growth well above VUZI's 195.52%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
803.13%
Growth well above VUZI's 179.34%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.61%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -49.01%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-46.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -336.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.91%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-13.79%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-37.14%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-887.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -336.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.98%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.