PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
97.25%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 47.59%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
32.78%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 0.15%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
128.93%
Some yoy growth while VUZI is negative at -99.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
40.94%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -23.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-18.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -7.80%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-584.49%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 12.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-507.08%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with VUZI at -30.21%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
12225.71%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -130.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
242.86%
Growth well above VUZI's 80.85%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.32%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of VUZI's 515.92%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
68.74%
CapEx growth well above VUZI's 87.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-47.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
27.95%
Liquidation growth of 27.95% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
88.40%
Growth well above VUZI's 94.98%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-30.39%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 87.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.17%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.