PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.04%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 545.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.64%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -9.85%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
0.21%
Some yoy growth while VUZI is negative at -62989.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
0.95%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -14.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-114.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -147.98%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
153.30%
AR growth well above VUZI's 4.58%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
129.13%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -100.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-134.89%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -2380.87%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-52.16%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 429.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.38%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -648.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-5.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -99.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
31.55%
Liquidation growth of 31.55% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
58.82%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. VUZI's 16920.20%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
15.48%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. VUZI's 16720.32%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
214.29%
Issuance growth of 214.29% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.