PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -286.44%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
12.84%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 1.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-21.11%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 201.27%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.66%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -33.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-298.88%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 32.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-132.40%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -135.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-114.93%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 1559.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
76.15%
AP growth well above VUZI's 58.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
6.29%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -14.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.10%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 26.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-96.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 16.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
19.57%
Purchases growth of 19.57% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-17.10%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
42.86%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -100.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
14.96%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -101.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.42%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.