229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
59.04%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 32.94%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
61.88%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 13.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
247.79%
Some yoy growth while VUZI is negative at -74.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
21.65%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -40.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
922.92%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -40.47%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
79.59%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -156.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-300.60%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 254.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
204.66%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -47.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
546.99%
Growth well above VUZI's 13.15%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.41%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VUZI's 18.47%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
29.88%
CapEx growth well above VUZI's 27.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-9.75%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-750.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -265.61%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-213.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -2.08%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.24%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.