PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.00%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -76.95%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.55%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -7.87%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-34.01%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 1861.65%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.50%
SBC growth of 5.50% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-101.25%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 38.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
775.75%
AR growth well above VUZI's 97.35%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
131.63%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VUZI's 325.84%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-271.96%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 1.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-104.35%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 8.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.62%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -85.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
6.35%
Lower CapEx growth vs. VUZI's 63.85%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
94.72%
Acquisition growth of 94.72% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-18.23%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
20.81%
Liquidation growth of 20.81% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
21.15%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. VUZI's 51.31%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-6.18%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 63.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.84%
Issuance growth of 161.84% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.