PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.87%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -206.81%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.25%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -2.42%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-343.92%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 1546.21%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.98%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -80.89%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
175.41%
Well above VUZI's 27.99% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-142.91%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -182.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
85.18%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -93.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
2326.42%
AP growth well above VUZI's 110.93%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
140.15%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -381.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.57%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -5.74%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-14.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -219.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
63.19%
Acquisition growth of 63.19% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
37.84%
Purchases growth of 37.84% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-22.85%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
129.47%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -2189.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
109.39%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -219.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
225.00%
Issuance growth of 225.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
69.31%
Buyback growth of 69.31% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.