PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.79%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -84.18%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-11.99%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 1.74%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-35.67%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 51.52%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.20%
SBC growth of 2.20% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-101.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 59.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
509.74%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -20.19%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
181.84%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 244.85%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-229.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -23.32%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-96.64%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -120.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.28%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 15.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
27.30%
CapEx growth well above VUZI's 25.27%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
93.52%
Acquisition growth of 93.52% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.29%
Purchases growth of 13.29% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
54.09%
Liquidation growth of 54.09% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-660.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 19.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
177.74%
Investing outflow well above VUZI's 25.27%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.48%
Issuance growth of 54.48% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-257.35%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.