PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.28%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -91.39%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.18%
Less D&A growth vs. VUZI's 50.98%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-173.70%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 158.65%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.25%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -63.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
327.27%
Well above VUZI's 103.92% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-502.21%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -646.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-204.68%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 202.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
5528.85%
AP growth well above VUZI's 225.83%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
430.00%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -259.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VUZI's 8.21%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-58.45%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 97.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-745.72%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
19.68%
Purchases growth of 19.68% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
30.19%
Liquidation growth of 30.19% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-70.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 103.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
113.49%
Investing outflow well above VUZI's 100.30%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
213.83%
Issuance growth of 213.83% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-240.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.