PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
112.87%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 19.43%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
30.78%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 45.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
372.24%
Some yoy growth while VUZI is negative at -77.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
16.54%
Less SBC growth vs. VUZI's 2588.21%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
251.10%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -12595.73%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
111.47%
AR growth well above VUZI's 148.26%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
30.08%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -159.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
6.31%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -406.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1331.82%
Growth well above VUZI's 120.75%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.51%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -118.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
15.24%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -313.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
99.20%
Acquisition growth of 99.20% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
20.46%
Purchases growth of 20.46% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-59.24%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
622.22%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -209.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-806.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -3039.35%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.88%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 6178.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
70.41%
Buyback growth of 70.41% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.